🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have decided to pull out from an global treaty created to safeguard females from abuse, covering family violence, following prolonged and heated discussions in the parliament.

Thousands of protesters assembled in the capital this past week to voice disagreement with the vote. The ultimate authority now rests with President the nation's president, who must decide whether to endorse or reject the proposed law.

Known as the European treaty, the international accord only took effect in the Baltic state last year, mandating authorities to develop legal frameworks and assistance programs to eliminate all types of violence.

Latvia has become the first European Union member to begin the procedure of withdrawing from the treaty. Turkey pulled out in two years ago, a decision that rights groups characterized as a significant regression for gender equality.

Political Controversy and Resistance

The treaty was ratified by the EU in 2023, yet traditionalist factions have argued that its focus on gender equality undermines traditional families and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Saeima, MPs decided 56 to 32 to exit from the convention, a action sponsored by political opponents but backed by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a defeat for centre-right government leader Evika Silina, who stood with demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that violence will not prevail," she stated to the crowd.

Ideological Divisions and Responses

One of the main parties advocating for the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose leader has called on citizens to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

The nation's ombudswoman the rights official appealed for the agreement not to be politicized, while the organization Equality Now stated it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The Thursday's vote has provoked widespread protest both within Latvia and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand people have endorsed a national petition calling for the treaty to be maintained. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has announced a protest for the coming week, accusing MPs of ignoring the wishes of the nation's citizens.

Global Concerns and Possible Future Actions

The head of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly stated that the Baltic state had made a rash decision fueled by misinformation. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and deeply concerning regression for women's rights and human rights in the continent".

He noted that since Turkey left the treaty four years ago, cases of femicide and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not achieve a two-thirds majority, the president could possibly return the bill for further review if he holds concerns.

Head of State Rinkevics announced on social media that he would evaluate the decision according to constitutional principles, "considering governmental and judicial considerations, instead of ideological or political viewpoints".

Last week, another member of the governing alliance, the reformist party, indicated it would not exclude appealing to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a concerning development for gender equality not only in Latvia but throughout Europe," commented a human rights activist.

• Family violence statistics have been rising in several EU nations
• The Istanbul Convention requires specific legal protections for victims of gender-based violence
• Latvia's vote could influence similar debates in other member states